Citizens' Critical Issues for Discussions and Inclusion at the 2014 National Dialogue

CITIZENS’ CRITICAL ISSUES FOR DISCUSSIONS AND INCLUSION AT THE 2014 NATIONAL DIALOGUE BEING A PAPER PRESENTED BY D. TOLA WINJOBI (PhD), PRINCIPAL COORDINATOR OF CAFSO-WRAG FOR DEVELOPMENT AND CONVENER, CAMPAIGN 2015+ INTERNATIONAL AT SOUTHWEST CSO CONSULTATIVE FORUM ON PRIORITY FOR THE NATIONAL CONFAB AT PLANET ONE HOTEL, MOBOLAJI BANK ANTHONY WAY, MARYLAND, LAGOS MARCH 11, 2014

There is no way we talk about the National Dialogue without talking about the Constitution of Nigeria as most of the issues at the confab would deal with the review or enactment of a new constitution ultimately. Nigerian Constitution has undergone different reviews at different times of her development and the most prominent were those post-independence reviews. For obvious reasons, the Nigerian Constitution suffered a lot of setbacks during the military aberration in our body polity as all of the time the military’s first action whenever they struck was to suspend the constitution and render inactive almost all the democratic structures. This goes to show that the Nigerian political process has undergone a tortuous journey of transition. With the advent of the Fourth Republic, there has been a sigh of relief as Nigerians now have the opportunity to tinker with the Constitution one time or the other. The most recent being the one led by the Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution which took place between Wednesday 14th and Friday 16th November 2012 at Lagos Airport Hotel, Ikeja, Lagos. It was a simultaneous public hearing across the six geo-political zones. Earlier, on the 31st of October 2012, there was a previous one led by the House of Representatives that took place in the various states and local communities of Nigeria.

I did lament at that time that it’s a pity that we had put the cart before the horse because the public hearing ought to have begun at the zonal level to the national rather than the other way round as it was done then in 2012. I posed some conundrum in 2012 when the review of the 1999 Constitution started. Perhaps, I could still ask the questions as they are relevant.

Do we really need to undergo the exercise of tinkering with the provisions of the 1999 constitution? Or we consider the total overhaul of the whole constitution giving to ourselves a brand new baby rather than repackaging this ill-fated adopted child called constitution? Answering those questions, I think the proposed National Dialogue could lead to overhauling of the constitution.
I also remarked at the time that many things were wrong with this present constitution ab initio. The preamble says “We the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria…give to ourselves….”. Everyone knows that this constitution was the premature child of necessity (probably an illegitimate child) hurriedly conceived, delivered, and handed over to the politicians by the military under the leadership of General Abdulsalam Abubakar. No wonder the end-product is defective. Perhaps the National Dialogue would also address this by reflecting the true ownership of the new Constitution since, it is believed, Nigerian citizens would be involved through this process.

Most importantly, I emphasised that the most hated issue of sovereign national conference would have been better than this amendment to the constitution. The conference would have afforded Nigerians of different ethnic nationalities to express their yearnings and aspirations for the existence of this country if it needs to exist at all as a nation, and to discuss the imbalance and injustice in our land.

Now, what we have is National Dialogue. Where is the Sovereign National Conference we were asking for? Are we sure the end-result of this National Dialogue is not going to suffer similar set backs that other similar conferences suffered in the past? Is the government of President Jonathan serious and really committed to the wish of the people? Going by various statements made by the President and his aides, the outcome of the dialogue shall be forwarded to the national Assembly for ratification. In effect, the National Assembly is still going to tinker with the outcome. This is where the problem lies as the final document might not reflect the yearnings and aspirations of the citizens of this country; it is hoped event would prove otherwise.

One unique feature of this dialogue is the fact that it is seemingly all-inclusive as different sections of the society were involved. These include CSOs/NGOs, Faith-Based Organizations, Community-Based Organizations, Organized labour, Private Sector, Community Development Associations, traditional rulers, professional associations, individuals, women, farmers, teachers including the politicians and the legislators themselves. It was gratifying to note that though there are dissenting voices against it, Nigerians as whole welcomed this National Dialogue which would serve as a vanguard of social justice and political freedoms, a forum for united front on key strategic issues affecting Nigerian citizens.

It is necessary we bare the minds of our people concerning the National Dialogue and their propositions. Efforts would be made to refer to only those ones that are pertinent to the southwest generally and others of relevance to this discourse. Though some of these may sound controversial, it portends the beauty of democracy, no doubt.

There are several burning issues from across the country being canvassed for inclusion at the dialogue. For easy understanding, the following key positions are germane: Constitutional reforms; Political party reforms; Electoral reform; Judicial reform; Police reform; and Civil Society reform. All these six key reform areas are the considered issues, in my view, for consideration at the National Dialogue and are largely but not limited to the following:

  • Devolution of Powers (too much concentration of power at the centre),

  • Federal Character: ossifies principle of fairness and breeds mediocrity and incompetence in civil service precluding attainment of vision 20-2020
  • Creation of more states and boundary adjustment to remove ambiguities, with contiguous linguistic groups federating with their homogenous groups (e.g Yoruba ethnic groups in Kwara, Kogi, Edo, Delta and Benue should federate with their brothers and sisters in the nearest states of Osun, Ekiti, and Ondo).
  • Recognition of the Six Geo-Political Zones in the Constitution with each having autonomy,
  • Three major ethnic groups recognised over 350 ethnic groups and preservation of the rights of the minority groups
  • Roles of Traditional Rulers
  • Local Government Autonomy
  • Revenue allocation and Fiscal Federalism; each federating unit generating its own resources and paying taxes to the central government,
  • Resource Control: southwest’s control of her sea, air, land and natural resources (oil and gas) remitting 15% net earning to the federal government.
  • CSOs reform: complementing govt effort; enabling environment (e.g. difficulty in registration with CAC); principles of accountability and transparency; proportional representation in national assignment
  • The Constitutional Amendment Process and writing a new one,
  • Immunity of certain public officers from prosecution with consideration for criminal cases,
  • Nigerian Police: Federal, regional and community police system that is not corrupt, non-partisan, and professional
  • Judicial System reforms: judiciary, bar, administration of justice, prison, alternative dispute resolution; the rule of law etc.
  • Prison System: admin reforms, infrastructural; decongestion; reformatory and rehabilitative vs punitive; human rights taking precedence,
  • The Executive
  • Rotation of Executive Offices,
  • Gender and other Special Groups,
  •  Mayoral Status for FCT Administration,
  • Status of Lagos State,
  • Residency and Indigeneship Provision,
  • Political party reforms including multi-party system, ideologies, manifestoes, ownership, financing, etc
  • Electoral reforms: independence and impartiality of INEC/SIEC; voting system; registration of voters; electoral staff and security officers, election observers; election petition, independence candidacy; Diaspora voting etc
  • No-go-area – negotiating the unity of Nigeria (different ideologies (Boko Haram), secession, self determination

Brief explanation of the points raised above are contained in my previous paper titled “Memorandum on the Review of 1999 Constitution Submitted by Dr David Tola Winjobi Convener, Campaign 2015+ International and Principal Coordinator, CAFSO-WRAG for Development Nigeria to the Senate Committee on Constitutional Review Held at Lagos Airport Hotel (Southwest) 15th and 16th November 2012”.


Communique Issued at the end of the Capacity Enhancement Workshop on Advocacy Skills for CSOs and the Media

COMMUNIQUE ISSUED AT THE END OF THE CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT WORKSHOP ON ADVOCACY SKILLS FOR CSOs AND THE MEDIA ON FOI ACT IMPLEMENTATION IN THE SOUTHWEST AT RICHTON HOTEL & SUITES, ABEOKUTA FROM 11TH TO 12TH SEPTEMBER 2013

Preamble

The Capacity Enhancement Workshop on Advocacy Skills for CSOs and Media on FOI Act Implementation in the South West was organized by the South West FOIA Network and supported by the Democratic Governance for Development (DGD-II) Project and its international partners – the EU, DFID, CIDA and UNDP. A total of 43 organizations from all the states of the region participated in the workshop.

Objectives

The objectives of the workshop were to:

  • Strengthen the advocacy skills of the CSOs to engage the leadership of the three arms of government in the Southwest States in pressing them to concretely implement the provisions of the FOIA in their respective states, in line with the age-long progressive leaning of the region.

  • Provide a platform for generating discussions and relevant actions around FOIA implementation.
  • Devise strategies that the Network could deploy to engage the law-makers in the respective states in the region in drafting and passing acceptable state FOI laws consistent with the FOIA at the national level.
  • Identify with a view to partnering with relevant MDAs, the institutional bodies affected by the FOIA and development partners in ensuring unfettered FOIA implementation.
  • Increase the capacity and skills of CSOs and the Media to embark on relevant activities to increase the level of awareness on the FOIA among members of the public including those at the grassroots.

The workshop was attended by representatives of CSOs and Media in the South West geo-political zone. The keynote address was delivered by Mrs. Abimbola Ibironke Akeredolu, the Hon. Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice for Ogun State ably represented by the Director, Legal Drafting, Barrister Lanre Iyanda.

There were also lead presentations on: ‘Understanding the Role of  Public Officials  and CSOs in the Successful Implementation of the FOIA in Nigeria’; ‘Community Mobilisation for Development: Strategies for CSOs Use of FOI Act in Making Requests’; ‘Traditional and Social Media as Watchdogs of FOIA implementation’; ‘Understanding Essential Elements of Advocacy in Engaging the Authorities on FOI Act: Some Critical Tools for CSOs’; ‘Methods and Strategies for Monitoring the Implementation of Freedom of Information Act’ and ‘The Imperative of the Rule of Law as a Fulcrum for Promoting, Accessing, and Upholding the FOI Act within the Nigeria Context’

In addition, there were plenary and group discussions on: ‘Practical Application of Freedom of Information Act for CSOs/Media: The Right to Ask;’ ‘Tackling the Challenges of Freedom of Information Act in Nigeria’; ‘Producing a position paper or a briefing note;’ ‘Carrying out a media interview’ and ‘Organizing a press conference.’

Observations

After comprehensive discussions of the keynote address and the lead presentations, the participants observed that:

  1. If information is the oxygen of democracy, we find it objectionable that 27 months after the enactment of the FOIA, save for Ekiti State which enacted its FOI Law on 4th July 2011 and is currently in the final stage of passing a more robust amended version, other states in the southwest region i.e. Ogun, Osun, Ondo, Oyo and Lagos are yet to either enact State Level FOI Laws or concretely implement the FOIA.

  2. Many public institutions in the region and across the Federation are yet to deliver on their obligations under the Act, including the all important duty to proactively disclose certain categories of information stipulated under Section 2 (3) of the Act.
  3. There is also persisting low level awareness on the detailed provisions of the legislation amongst public officials and members of the public, which is militating against robust usage of the law by various stakeholders.
  4. We are concerned that despite the plethora of binding judicial decisions from several superior courts of record, including the apex court in the country, which establish amongst others, the legal doctrine of covering the field, while state like Oyo in the region still insist that the FOIA does not apply to them.
  5. Despite the fact that the 7th Assembly of the Lagos State Parliament, recently revived the process of enacting a State level FOI Law, in a process that dates back to the 6th Assembly, we are concerned about reports of what appears to be an official policy that gags public officials in the state from responding to FOI requests received from members of the public.
  6. While the Act requires private institutions, including CSOs providing public services, performing public functions or utilizing public funds to be proactive in their duty of disclosure in accordance with the provisions of FOIA, we are concerned that this is not being done currently, due largely to a lack of proper understanding of the provisions of the Act.
  7. There is growing concern that journalists in some states in the region, especially those in government owned media houses exhibit tendencies depicting bias, partisanship and lack of professionalism in their work, which negatively affects the FOI compliance process, especially since they are major stakeholders in the FOI project in these States.
  8. In consonance with the letters and spirit of the FOIA, it is believed that proactively disclosing publicly details of the agreement reached in 2009 between the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) and the Federal Government would have gone a long way to compel the Federal Government to comply with the said agreement and avert the current strike action that has resulted in the over two months closure of Federal and State Universities nationwide.
  9. Unless there is a subsisting appeal by the defendants in the case, the continuing disobedience of the order of mandamus made by the Federal High Court on the 10th of July 2013 directing the Clerks of the Senate and House of Representatives to furnish the plaintiff, with the salaries, allowances and Constituency funds of Senator Ehigie Uzamere representing Edo South Senatorial District and the member representing Ovia Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives Nosakhare Osahon, is symptomatic of the culture of gross impunity and flagrant disregard for the rule of law and court orders by public officials which should attract immediate punitive consequences for all such offenders.
  10. Strong concern was expressed by participants on the call by some serving public officials that the FOIA be amended even though empirical evidence shows that the Law has hardly been significantly implemented by all tiers of government in the country.

Resolutions

The workshop also resolved/recommended as follows:

  1. Members of this Network, CSOs and other stakeholders in the region should be mobilised to sustain focused advocacy with the three arms of government in their respective States to ensure compliance with the FOIA and where desired, enactment of the state level FoI Laws that meet the minimum benchmarks established  in the FOIA.
  2. Public institutions in the region and the nation at large should, as a matter of urgency put in place the requisite framework and machinery for delivering on their obligations under the Act, including the all important duty to proactively disclose certain categories of information stipulated under Section 2 (3) of the Act.
  3. In line with the provisions of Section 13 of the FOIA, governments in the region should immediately embark on robust capacity building programmes aimed at deepening the understanding of public officials on the provisions of the FOIA. Furthermore, such capacity building and sensitization programs should also be extended to members of the public resident in the region.
  4. Following existing judicial decisions from several superior courts of record, including the apex court in the country, establishing the legal doctrine of ‘covering the field,’ members of the Network call on state governments in the region to as a matter of urgency, uphold these existing judicial precedents by implementing the provisions of the FOIA forthwith in their respective states.
  5. The Network commends the 7th Assembly of the Lagos State Parliament for reviving the process of enacting a State level FOI Law in Lagos State and hopes that the process would be completed speedily. In furtherance to this positive development the Network also calls on the executive arm of government in the state to, as a matter of urgency clarify the allegation making the rounds of the existence of an official policy that prevents public officials in the state from responding to FOI requests received from members of the public. The Network also urges all arms of government in the state to commence the process of putting the requisite machinery in place for promoting the public’s right to know as enshrined in the FOIA.
  6. The Network will partner with other stakeholders in the region to carry out capacity building and sensitization programmes for private institutions, including CSOs who provide public services, perform public functions or utilize public funds to be proactive in their duty of disclosure in accordance with the provisions of FOIA.
  7. Members of the Network will carry out advocacy with journalists in some states in the region, especially those in government owned media houses to be unbiased, non-partisan and professional in their work, which also aids the process of FOI compliance in their respective states.
  8. The Network calls on the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) and the Federal Government to proactively and urgently disclose publicly details of the agreement reached in 2009 as part of the process of resolving once and for all the issues implicated in the current crises.
  9. There should be immediate punitive consequences for all public officials who disregard court orders enforcing compliance with FOIA.
  10. Participants distance themselves from the call by some serving public officials that the FOIA be amended despite the fact that it has not been substantially implemented in any shape or form. We reiterate that at this point in time, emphasis should be on implementing the FOIA, so that its benefits can be enjoyed by all and sundry, including government itself rather than a premature amendment that does no good to the legislation.
  11. In view of the growing recourse to the courts as the most viable forum for resolving FOIA disputes the Network calls on the National Judicial Institute as a matter of urgency and necessity to organise capacity building training programmes on FOIA for the judiciary at all levels. Furthermore, the Network also urges the judiciary as a key arm of government to immediately kick-start the process of complying with the FOIA in all ramifications.
  12. The Network will seek partnership with the Human Rights Committees of the branches of the Nigeria Bar Associations (NBA) in their respective states to provide pro bono services for resolving FOIA disputes.

Conclusion

The participants appreciate the support provided by the UNDP’s Democratic Governance for Development (DGD-II) and its international partners, the EC, DFID, CIDA to the Southwest FOIA Network for the success of the workshop and calls on them to kindly provide additional support to the Network as it embarks on the process of taking the FOIA implementation campaign in the Southwest zone further.

Signed on behalf of the participating Southwest CSOs:

  • Ayo Adebusoye                                 ………………………………………………………………………….
  • Rita Ilevbare                                      ………………………………………………………………………….
  • Ebofin Michael                                   ………………………………………………………………………….
  • Gbenga Ganzallo                               ………………………………………………………………………….
  • Jide Bamgbose                                   …………………………………………………………………………..
  • Moji Akinsanya                                  ………………………………………………………………………….
  • Tola Winjobi                                        ……………………………………………………………………………….(Zonal Coordinator)
Enhanced by Zemanta

List of Participants at the Abeokuta Capacity Enablement on SoIA Advocacy Strategy for CSOs and the Media

S/N

NAME

SEX

ORGANIZATION

ADDRESS

PHONE

EMAIL

1.

Pastor (Mrs.) E. Yinka Odedele

F

Gender Equality and the Girl Child Development Foundation 33 Irese Road, Shagari Village, Akure

08034716144

08053790625

gegcdf@yahoo.com

2.

Prof. A. A. Ilemobade

M

Upline  Resources Foundation SGB Adesida Road, Akure

08034545538

08033946058

urfoundation2000@yahoo.com

3.

Kemi Oyewole

F

Global Network for Community Development 1 Oyewole Street, Ajalogun, Off Ijare Road, Ikere-Ekiti

07064208901

kemigncd@yahoo.com

4.

Adebisi Ademola

M

Save Our Land 44 Olofa Estate, Ofatedo

08035141040

adexconsult2@yahoo.com

solnigeria1@gmail.com

5.

Bamgbose Jide

M

Justice Development and Peace Commission, Ibadan St. Patrick’s Catholic Church Compound, Basorun

08056718663

Jidebam60@yahoo.com

6.

Nike Obatayo

F

Adenike Obatayo Hope Foundation (ADOHF), Formality Gender Equity Network (FGEN) Suite 3 and 4 Fajuyi Hall, Ado-Ekiti

08266661555

08044974295

genoekiti@yahoo.com

genoekiti@gmail.com

adohoffice@gmail.com

7.

Franklin Oloniju

M

Life and Peace Development Organisation Akure

08032153120

lapdo4development@gmail.com

8.

Gbenga Ganzallo

M

Women Arise for Change Initiative 26 Adebowale Street, Ojodu-Berger, Lagos

08037223313

gbengaantonio@gmail.com

9.

Olaniji Olutowo M Media Advocacy Partnership Ikeja, Lagos

08136927229

sotanolam@yahoo.com

10.

Omolara Olusaiye

F

CSO Media Network 15A Harvey Road, Off Alagomeji, Yaba

08060563329

omolara01@yahoo.com

11.

Elegbede Tayo

M

ARL Foundation Lagos

08081100438

tayojet@gmail.com

12.

Ayo Adebusoye

M

NNGO, Lagos 151 Akowonjo Road, Egbeda, Lagos

08037191342

ayo@nnngo.org

13.

Adebesin Abiodun

M

JDPC 1 Bishop Emeritus Compound, Ijebu-Ode

08062034717

adebesin4u@yahoo.com

14.

Imam Shaikh Busairi

M

World Islamic Peace Foundation (WIPF) Imam Ajimofowoku House, Yemetu-Aladorin, Box 7647, Secretariat, Ibadan

08032230454

imambusairi@yahoo.com

15.

Revd. Mrs. E. O. Ajayi

F

Bemel Community Development Initiative Plot 5, Caren Estate, Eruomu Layout, Old Ife Road, Ibadan

08033242310

bettytundeajayi@gmail.com

16.

Agnes Tola Winjobi

M

CAFSO Women’s Rights Action Group Plot 5 Akingbade Street, Off New Gbagi Market, Ibadan

08033456377

yinkuswinco88@yahoo.com

17.

Rita Ilevbare

F

FIDA High Court Premises, Ekiti Judiciary, Ado-Ekiti

08033551144

ekitisjf@yahoo.com

18.

Adeniji Jesupemiwale

M

Added Value Initiation (AVI) 8 Omotayo Street, Off Ilare Road, Ado+Ekiti

08062829718

jesupemiwale2003@yahoo.com

19.

Kemi Adesina Sajebi

F

Youth Network on HIV/AIDS Population and Development Ota, Ogun State

08036965678

kemiadesina30@yahoo.com

20.

Olu Ogunrotimi

M

Environmental Development and Family Health Organisation Olorunsogo Street, Opposite School of Nursing, Ado-Ekiti

08034719196

oluogunrotim@yahoo.com

21.

Kosoko Adesola

F

Lagos State Television Lateef Jakande Road, Agindigbi

08023115497

adesolakosoko@yahoo.com

22.

Chika Izuora

M

Leadership Lagos

08033315611

stanizuora@yahoo.com

23.

Wale Akintade

M

JONAPWD, Ondo 3 Dare Ajayi Street, Akure, Ondo

08038633440

jonapwdondo@yahoo.com

24.

Mojisola Akinsanya

F

Commonwealth Women’s Organisation Nigeria 28, Ibadan Road Camp, Abeokuta

06033276770

jisolaus@yahoo.com

25.

Adebayo Samuel

M

Royal Concept International Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State

070563218086

adebayosamuelsound@yahoo.com

26.

Azeez Tajudeen

M

JONGO Osogbo, Osun State

08061268470

tjong4sure@yahoo.com

27.

Ebofin Michael

M

Justice Development and Peace Makers’ Centre,  Osogbo Osogbo

08030012325

michoebofin@gmail.com

28.

Dr. Daniel Tola Winjobi

M

Campaign 2015 plus International 5 Akingbade Street, Box 1500, Agodi-Ibadan

08030618326

080200828222

tolawinjobi58@yahoo.com

campaign2015@gmail.com

29.

Aladejare Abimbola

F

The New Generation Girls & Women Development Initiative (NIGAW) Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State

07033163838

newgenerationinitiative@gmail.com

30.

Michael Olatubosun

M

Diamond Radio University of Ibadan

08023577565

miketonbosu@yahoo.com

31.

Dayo Bamgbose

M

CISCOM D Ibadan, Oyo State

08033505916

ciscmday@yahoo.com

32.

Enike Vincent

M

Vinmot Foundation Osogbo, Osun State

08138591526

enikevincent@gmail.com

33.

Ilesanmi Adetoun F.

F

Garnet Youth Synergy, Osogbo Osogbo, Osun State

08076480829

iadetoruba@yahoo.com

34.

Hon. Adeshola Afariogun

M

African Foundation for Environment and Development (AFED) 29, Bolanle Awosika Street, Off Ilogbo Road, Ota, Ogun State

08033248636

shoal@afariogun.com

35.

Segun  Olatunji

M

Punch Newspapers Abeokuta, Ogun State

08034320077

segunolatunjiu@ogun.com

36.

Oguntoyinbo Tolulope

F

CELSUM, Osogbo Osogbo, Osun State

08026579556

37.

Tunde Hassan

M

HEDA Resource Centre 20 Mojidi Street, Ikeja, Lagos

08035220935

08022662653

tunisky@yahoo.com

hedagenda@yahoo.com

38.

Eyitayo Fabunmi

M

Centre for Social Reconditioning and Development (CEPSOR) Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State

08038490652

cefsord@gmail.com

Enhanced by Zemanta