Post-2015 MDGs Development Agenda: Issues and Insights

INTRODUCTION

In the decades preceding the turn of the new millennium, there were hopes and expectations that year 2000 would provide a magic wand that would provide solutions to many if not all of the intractable challenges facing humanity. It was a period where commonplace were slogans such as “health for all by the year 2000”, “education for all by the year 2000”, “food sufficiency for all by the year 2000”, “shelter for all by the year 2000”, “prosperity for all by the year 2000” and several other slogans. Poverty, hunger, starvation and diseases seemed to be the major challenges facing the developing nations while the developed economies seemed to be enjoying the benefits of development including human rights, democracy, and good governance.

The United Nations indeed felt concerned about the plight of common people especially in the global south. In order to address the problem of poverty and promote sustainable developments, the 8 millennium goals were adopted in September 2000 at the largest gathering of Heads of States committing both rich and poor countries to do all they can to eradicate poverty, promote human dignity and equality, and achieve peace, democracy and environmental stability. By this commitment the world has an unprecedented opportunity to improve the lives of billions of people by adopting practical approaches to meeting the Millennium Development Goals.

The MDGs and related targets and indicators serve as benchmarks of progress towards the shared vision of where we want to go and commitment to work together to get there. There are 18 targets and 48 indicators set to achieve the 8 goals by 2015. Three distinct characteristics of MDGs are that: it is people-centred; it is adaptable to SMART test; and it involves the development partners, among others.

There have been several  initiatives, alliances, formations, coalitions, organizations  including NGOs, CBOs, FBOs, trade unions, professional associations, student organizations, community groups, bilateral and multilaterals, and intergovernmentals working worldwide alongside the UN and governments in order to attain the vision and mission of the United Nations on the Millennium Declaration.

THE CHALLENGES OF ATTAINMENT  OF MDGs

Can we attain MDGs by 2015? Yes, No! If “Yes” what happens, do we rest on our oars ? and if “No” what about it, do we become despondent? The need to monitor and evaluate performance on MDGs implementation is not only important but also highly necessary so as to know whether the programme is on course or derailing, or to know how far we have gone, and where we need to strengthen our efforts. Monitoring and evaluation efforts have shown some astounding results giving way to despondency on attaining MDGs by 2015.

Thirteen years on from the original adoption of the MDGs at the 2000 Millennium Summit, and two years left to 2015 it seems all the efforts by stakeholders towards achieving MDGs are not drastic enough. According to the UN Secretary-General, though there is some remarkable progress made in some countries, collectively we are falling short in the achievement of MDGs globally. The consequence of these shortfalls, further aggravated by the combined effects of the global food, climate, energy and economic crises, is that improvements in the lives of the poorest are happening at an unacceptably slow pace while in some countries, hard fought gains are being eroded. At the current pace, several of the eight MDGs and associated targets are likely to be missed in many countries. The challenges are most severe in the least developed countries (LDCs), land-locked developing countries (LLDCs) and some small island developing states (SIDS).

Therefore, if MDGs cannot be achieved by 2015 (which is very certain), the need to look beyond the target year is imperative. CSOs therefore have a crucial role to play in further engaging the governments to address those MDG lines they could not achieve at the set date and do more on those they achieved. If governments achieved MDGs by 2015 (which is very uncertain), imperative is the need for the CSOs to further engage governments in monitoring and evaluation  so as to consolidate on and not to derail from the gains hitherto achieved.

Though the MDGs are people-centred and development focused, lacking are the essential ingredients of human rights, peace and justice which are the bedrocks of development. The issues of democracy, good governance, and human rights, are not expressly stated in the Millennium Declaration though they can be linked in some way. However justice, peace, and security especially global terrorism are difficult to situate within the purview of the 8 goals.

CONSULTATIONS FOR A POST-2015 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT AGENDA

The need for all to look beyond 2015 MDGs is emphasised in the 2010 Annual report of the Secretary-General (11 July 2011) titled, “Accelerating progress towards the Millennium Development Goals: options for sustained and inclusive growth and issues for advancing the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015”. The Millennium Development Goal summit requested the Secretary-General to make recommendations in his annual reports, as appropriate, for further steps to advance the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015.  Over the coming months, structured discussions, in different United Nations forums, will enable Member States and other relevant stakeholders especially the CSOs to make their own assessments on how the Millennium Development Goals should be reviewed and rethought. The post-2015 development framework is likely to have the best development impact if it emerges from an inclusive, open and transparent process with multi-stakeholder participation. Using established global, regional and national mechanisms and processes is one way to ensure that such deliberations benefit from the wide range of lessons learned and the experiences of different stakeholders.  Several formal and informal meetings are scheduled in the run-up to 2015. In addition to taking stock of Millennium Development Goals progress, these could discuss elements of a post-2015 framework.

The UN has started the work programme to foster a broad based, open and inclusive dialogue with all stakeholders, including civil society actors, on the post-2015 agenda. A key part of this will be a global conversation on post-2015 to capture the voices of citizens.  As indicated in the UN Secretary General’s report to the General Assembly in September 2011, the UN Millennium Campaign will act as one of the outreach mechanisms to civil society to gather inputs and feedback on the post-2015 agenda and facilitate dialogue with the UN system. The UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the UN Department for Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) have been mandated by the Secretary-General to lead the work on the post-2015 framework. A Task Team of senior technical experts from UNDP and DESA, chaired by Olav Kjorven (UNDP) and Jomo Kwame Sundaram (DESA), and supported by the full UN system, was set up in January 2012 to define a system-wide vision for the post-2015 agenda.

The UN Secretary-General has also set up a think than group called High Level Panel to whom the reports on various consultations would be submitted. The HLP would advise the UN Sec-Gen on the reports. Among the HLP are two Nigerians: Ms Amina Ibrahim (Mohammed), and Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. The Task Team is   mandated to produce a study which will serve as a roadmap for the work of a High-Level Panel that the UN Secretary General has appointed third quarter of 2012. The study will critically appraise the current MDG framework, map on-going activities inside and outside of the UN on defining a post-2015 agenda, and assess challenges that have become more prominent in the last decade.

As part of this work, UNDP, working with other UN Development Group (UNDG) agencies, is supporting consultations at the national level in up to 50 countries and producing and distributing guidance notes to the UN Country Teams to facilitate these exercises. The consultations are  set up in a way that facilitates the inclusion of voices of poor people and those that are vulnerable; although the modes of doing this will depend on the country context. The detailed list of countries and type of support that will be offered are already being shared  UNDP is also facilitating 8 regional/global consultations to discuss thematic and cross-cutting issues in post- 2015 global agenda, such as inequality, sustainability, population and governance. As a general principle, civil society organisations are invited to participate in all levels of the consultations.

The CS has a key role to play in the various deliberations towards post-2015 development agenda. Campaign2015+, Beyond 2015, GCAP etc have been involved in all the processes. Beyond 2015 has appointed Campaign2015+International to lead the CS deliberations in Nigeria.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAMPAIGN2015+ INTERNATIONAL AND BEYOND 2015

By default, Campaign2015+ International is a staunch member of Beyond 2015 and an international member of GCAP and CIVICUS. CIVICUS has funded our project before on poverty hearing in Nigeria. Our members have served in various committees and discussion groups set up by Beyond 2015 since 2011. Few of these would suffice:

  • We were since April 2011 on Beyond-2015’s discussion group on Essential Must-Haves for a global development framework
  • Since 23 August 2011 we have been part of Beyond 2015 governance working group
  • In September 2011, We made substantive contributions to the  commissioned  paper from a consultant, Kel Currah, to work closely from Beyond 2015’s must-haves to flesh out how the principles of an inclusive, participative and legitimate process would translate in practice;
  • We are also a contributory member of Beyond 2015’s Position paper on UN Thematic Group on Conflict, Fragility and Disaster.
  • In May 2012 we were an active member of 3rd Teleconference Berlin Working Group on MDG Advocacy & Post-2015
  • In February 2012 we contested though lost the membership of  the Executive Committee of Beyond 2015.

Though with membership in some African countries, Campaign 2015+ is located in Nigeria  which is one of the countries that UNDG-led consultations would take place. This would afford us the opportunity to input into the UN discussions. Apart from its large membership across Nigeria, it is the only coalition that has grassroots reaches which would make it easy for us to have all-inclusive discussions on post-2015 global development agenda.  Also, Campaign2015+ knows the issue bordering on post-2015 more so that its members are members of Beyond 2015 while its convener led GCAP campaign in Nigeria for three years. It is interesting to note that it is the only coalition not only in Nigeria but also in Africa primarily established to collaborate with governments to attain MDGs and to campaign beyond 2015 on development issue. Importantly, Campaign2015+ is the only coalition so far in Nigeria that has started discussions already on post-2015 agenda as it has solely organised several meetings already (we have report to back this up) while it collaborated once with a Faith-based group to organize another one.

THE EFFORTS SO FAR

Campaign2015+ in the third quarter of 2012  formed a national think tank to strategize for holding national consultations. The first meeting hosted by JDPC took place in Ijebu-Ode in early September 2012. Campaign2015+ also single handedly sponsored and organized consultations in two states – Osun and Ondo States – and the deliberations continue. We expect each zone or state or local group to organize theirs also bordering on post-2015 MDG framework. Meanwhile, there have been several meetings now organized by various states especially in the southwest while individual groups like NYSC-MDG Group held theirs in Jalingo, Taraba State on post-2015 development agenda.

Towards the end of November 2012 having been appointed the Lead Agency to organize and coordinate deliberations on post-2015, Campaign2015+ International was supported by Beyond 2015 based in Brussels. Hence we are supporting small hubs of deliberations across the six geo-political zones of Nigeria.

We were/are to be supported with $10,000 for organizing zonal meetings and $5000 for national and regional meetings including secretariat support. On the modality for organizing the deliberation, we threw the debate open, and people agreed that we should have zonal deliberations so that the outcome would be all-inclusive. So, we are supporting each zonal deliberation with a sum ranging from N150,000-N200,000. The deliberations started in the second week of December till January 2013.

However, Campaign2015+ members agreed on the need to organize one national deliberation but we need to source for fund for this as the current grant cannot cover both the zonal and national. We have set up a small hub of three people to map out how we can contact the UN Country team for identifying with us and support to organize the national deliberation where we are going to bring to Abuja representatives of Campaign2015 from each zone/state. If you have any suggestion as to getting financial support for that one national deliberation, let us know. The Abuja deliberation would afford us the opportunity of formalising/ratifying the appointment of Ad-Hoc Committee as full-fledged Steering Committee or Governing Council.

I am happy to inform us too that Alliance for the Southern Civil Society on Health is partnering with Campaign2015+ in organizing an international interface and discussion of results on post-2015 health related issues in Abuja. Campaign2015+ has also been appointed as a Lead Author and a team member among ten who will be directing the work of the drafting team in synthesizing the inputs which Beyond2015 and other key partners have gathered thus far on the vision, purpose, principles and criteria of a post-2015 framework.

For more information contact:

+2348030618326, campaign2015@gmail.com, chuksojidoh@yahoo.com

http://campaign2015plus.blogspot.com

http://facebook.com/campaign2015international

http://m.facebook.com/groups/263518357002767?refid=27


Formal Launching of Post-2015 Global Development Framework Deliberations in Nigeria

It gives me pleasure to address you today on the current critical global development issue tagged “post-2015 MDGs development framework” as it affects Nigeria.

In order to address the problem of poverty and promote sustainable developments, the 8 millennium goals were adopted in September 2000 at the largest gathering of Heads of States committing both rich and poor countries to do all they can to eradicate poverty, promote human dignity and equality, and achieve peace, democracy and environmental stability. By this commitment the world has an unprecedented opportunity to improve the lives of billions of people by adopting practical approaches to meeting the Millennium Development Goals. The MDGs and related targets and indicators serve as benchmarks of progress towards the shared vision of where we want to go and commitment to work together to get there. There are 18 targets and 48 indicators set to achieve the 8 goals by 2015.

Twelve years on from the original adoption of the MDGs at the 2000 Millennium Summit, it seems all the efforts by stakeholders towards achieving MDGs by 2015 were not drastic enough. Though there is some remarkable progress made in some countries, collectively we are falling short in the achievement of MDGs especially in Nigeria. The consequence of these shortfalls, further aggravated by the combined effects of the global food, climate, energy, economic crises, and recently, terrorism, is that improvements in the lives of the poorest are happening at an unacceptably slow pace. Nigeria is fraught with despondency in the face of bad leadership, hunger, starvation, preventable diseases, moral decadence and corruption.

At the current pace, several of the eight MDGs and associated targets are likely to be missed in Nigeria. Nigerians are suffering amidst plenty as we have both human and material resources. About 72 % Nigerians are still living in poverty (Nigeria Bureau of Statistics 2011) while our youths are passing out from higher institutions without jobs thus turning some of them to emergency robbers while many are desperate to get out of the country. Our educational system from primary to tertiary level is in shambles while our health systems are in abysmal decay as our national budget on health has never reached 15% as canvassed for internationally. Both infant mortality and maternal mortality ratios are increasing by the day as women are still dying while giving birth.

Myriads are the challenges against attainment of MDGs in Nigeria. Things that are supposedly to work are not working. Vision 20-2020 cannot see any vision for Nigeria to be one of the 20 topmost economies of the world as industries are relocating to neighboring countries like Sierra Leone and Ghana while many are folding up. Power supply in Nigeria is an albatross and has been erratic or epileptic throwing many into further poverty. Our oil is a paradox as we import what we produce because the greedy cartels and political saboteurs are not making our refineries work for selfish reasons. Religious and ethnic crises have become the order of the day. Insecurity has become a major challenge and the bane of development especially with Boko Haram unleashing terror on innocent Nigerians while the federal government seems helpless.

Nigeria needs good leadership, not political caterwauls. It needs leaders that have political will to transform Nigeria from this state of squalor to an enviable position among the comity of nations. Nigeria needs committed leaders that are ready to stamp out corruption by sealing the leakages of public funds into private pockets and genuinely prosecuting sleazebag.

Looking beyond MDGs 2015 globally, the focus now is post-2015 development framework which centers on sustainable development goals. The need to look beyond 2015 MDGs is emphasized in the 2010 Annual Report of the Secretary-General (11 July 2011) titled, “Accelerating progress towards the Millennium Development Goals: options for sustained and inclusive growth and issues for advancing the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015”. The Millennium Development Goal summit requested the Secretary-General to make recommendations in his annual reports, as appropriate, for further steps to advance the United Nations development agenda beyond 2015.

Between now and coming months, structured discussions, in different United Nations forums, will enable Member States (including Nigeria) and other relevant stakeholders especially the CSOs to make their own assessments on how the Millennium Development Goals should be reviewed and rethought. Fortunately, Nigeria is one of the fifty countries that UN-led national deliberations would be organized while two Nigerians are on the High Level Panel set up by the UN Secretary-General. The post-2015 development framework is likely to have the best development impact if it emerges from a broad-based, inclusive, open and transparent process with multi-stakeholder participation. Using established global, regional and national mechanisms and processes is one way to ensure that such deliberations benefit from the wide range of lessons learned and the experiences of different stakeholders.

Campaign2015+ International believes that civil society as well as the fourth estate of the realm has a key role to play in the various deliberations towards post-2015 development agenda. And thus, it is the only coalition so far in Nigeria that has started discussions already on post-2015 agenda as its members have been organising deliberations at the grassroots level. This southwest zonal deliberation is an effort geared at sensitising the people to participate actively in post-2015 global development agenda by making their voices count in the process and implementation of the new sustainable development goals. The deliberations which have started at the local level would go through the six geo-political zones of Nigeria to be consummated at the national level to coincide with the UN-led national deliberation before March2013. We encourage individuals, organizations, and the press to make input into these post-2015 development framework discussions so that the voices of Nigerians would be heard on the kind of world they want, in particular, the kind of Nigeria they desire.

We therefore call on the Nigerian government, the Nigerian members of the High Level Panel, UN systems, development agencies, civil society organisations and all stakeholders to join in a synergistic partnership with Campaign2015+international to ensure that the poor and those highly affected by poverty in Nigeria have a voice in the process of developing a more sustainable global development framework.

– See more at: http://localhost/campaign2015/an-address-presented-by-dr-tola-winjobi-convener-campaign-2015-international-marking-the-formal-launching-of-post-2015-global-development-framework-deliberations-in-nigeria/#sthash.si7FZe61.dpuf


Amnesty International's Contribution to Post 2015 Development Agenda

Your Excellencies,

 Amnesty International welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the High Level Panel’s civil society consultation ahead of the meeting in Monrovia, Liberia (30 January – 2 February 2013), including through the online consultations. We appreciate that a set of 24 of framing questions have been put forward to guide the Panel’s considerations. At the same time, we regret the absence of key questions on how international human rights treaty standards and principles can – and must – frame and inform the identification of priorities for the post-2015 development agenda.

In order for the post-2015 development framework to be truly effective in transforming the lives of all those living in poverty, it must be guided by a framework for the realisation of human rights based on the range of obligations already undertaken by states. Human rights standards and principles strengthen global policy coherence, and help construct an accountability framework at global, regional, national and sub-national levels to ensure that post-2015 commitments are honoured in practice and effectively implemented on the ground.

In view of the above, Amnesty International respectfully urges the High Level Panel to ask the following framing questions which specifically address fundamental human rights principles, together with some of their key aspects:

How can we ensure that development policy and programmes are consistent with human rights obligations?

Consideration of this question should lead to a clear call for reaffirmation

  1. of all states’ legal obligations to respect, protect, and fulfil human rights;
  2. that national and international development policies, programmes and practice must reflect states’ obligations under international human rights law and
  3. that States engaging in international cooperation and technical and financial assistance, whether bilaterally and through international organisations, must be mutually accountable to ensure that such assistance is consistent with human rights obligations and for the necessity of carrying out adequate due diligence to prevent human rights abuses. Furthermore, each State should commit to designating or creating an institution with sufficient expertise to review development plans and related legislation and their implementation for consistency with human rights standards.

How can we ensure that development targets and frameworks are based on international human rights law?

This should include

  1. the establishment of timelines for fulfilling minimum essential levels of economic, social and cultural rights globally and for each country;
  2. clear and time-bound pledges by States in a position to provide assistance to ensure that there is adequate international co-operation assistance available where such assistance is necessary to ensure the realization of at least minimum essential levels of economic, social and cultural rights for all, and
  3. a commitment to strengthen international, regional and national systems for data collection on levels of access to water, sanitation, health, education, food and social protection to ensure that they fully assess quality, availability, physical accessibility and affordability. Such data must be disaggregated at least according to gender and the other most relevant grounds of discrimination, including ethnicity and disability.

How can we ensure a commitment to enhancing accountability mechanisms for existing human rights obligations as part of the framework for development after 2015?

This should include

  1. a commitment to ensure that people are able to use the law to enforce their rights and access effective remedies for all violations of human rights, in particular addressing any gaps in the law relating to the enforceability of economic, social and cultural rights;
  2. the removal of any barriers that people living in poverty face in accessing justice and effective remedies;
  3. a mandate for national human rights monitoring bodies as well as quasi-judicial regulatory bodies to monitor violations of human rights and to act on complaints, and ensure they have the capacity to do so effectively;
  4. increased monitoring and oversight by parliamentary bodies of efforts to meet the development goals, in particular to ensure their consistency with human rights obligations;
  5. use of the international human rights monitoring system to ensure consistency between development and human rights, for example through ratification of the Optional Protocols to the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, to provide additional scrutiny;
  6. systematic integration of reporting on national implementation of the development goals in reports to the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council and to international human rights treaty monitoring bodies and
  7. adoption of adequate safeguards, monitoring and accountability mechanisms to ensure that development assistance complies with human rights standards.

How can we ensure a commitment that development is inclusive, contributes to ending discrimination, guarantees gender equality and prioritises disadvantaged groups?

This should include

  1. a commitment that governments identify which groups are facing discrimination or particular barriers in realizing their rights and ensure that development efforts are designed and implemented in a way that focuses on removing these barriers and on improving the lives of the most disadvantaged;
  2. prioritization of the most disadvantaged groups in reforms to law, policy and practice, and take effective measures to end discriminatory measures such as violence against women and denial of sexual and reproductive rights;
  3. a requirement that States develop separate targets within national targets for the realization of economic, social and cultural rights for particular groups who face discrimination and disadvantage, monitor these targets, and collect data on the realization of economic, social and cultural rights that is disaggregated on the basis of gender and for other groups identified as facing discrimination and
  4. priority for disadvantaged groups in the allocation of resources from national funding and international assistance.

How do we reaffirm the right of access to information and participation?

This should include

  1. provision for effective participation in the processes of development – from priority setting to planning to implementation and monitoring – by ensuring access to relevant information and transparent processes which are inclusive and non-discriminatory, and consult the most affected
  2. commitment for each state to design and implement a poverty reduction framework that involves the active participation of those people living in poverty and (c) a requirement to respect, protect and fulfil the rights to freedom of expression, association, and assembly.

We are hoping that the Panel will be putting human rights at the centre of its deliberations and its report, and thus give an important impetus to worldwide implementation of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights. In doing so, the Panel would contribute to genuine progress towards ending freedom from fear and freedom from want, and contribute to a world in which women, men and children in all parts of the world can live in dignity.

Yours sincerely,

Yasmin Hussein

International Advocacy Director